Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical ad-hoc: Merged jitter sub-caluse proposal

To: STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical ad-hoc: Merged jitter sub-caluse proposal
From: Andre Szczepanek <aszczepanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:37:48 +0000
Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-3-400G>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-802-3-400G>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-802-3-400G-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-400G-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-400G-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Reply-to: Andre Szczepanek <aszczepanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-index: AdKRthRVDpYhIwL6Rk2u3iRqBZvpcQ==
Thread-topic: Electrical ad-hoc: Merged jitter sub-caluse proposal

At Yesterday’s P802.3bs Electrical Ad-Hoc meeting I announced I would create text for a merged Jitter sub-clause as a response to D3.0 comments.

I have done this, and also integrated the J4/J_RMS changes we discussed and word-smithed during the meeting.

A pdf of the proposed text has been uploaded to the ad hoc web page:

Although it will be reviewed at next Monday’s ad hoc, any comments before then are welcome.

Regards

Andre Szczepanek (Electrical Ad Hoc chair)