|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Hi Dave and all,
Please see my answers below.
Lennart, Yair -
Are we OK treating a DS PD with matched class signatures as if it is a single-load PD?
Yair: Yes. I believe we agree on it. Please see attached presentation about it.
If so, we make several things easier in the spec, and my inrush fix gets easier - only unmatched-class DS PDs need individual inrush specs, all others need to meet Iinrush total on all pairs (whatever that number is).
What if Type 3 or 4 wants to operate the 4P PD in a way that it starts with one channel and then with the other? i.e. not simultaneously turn on the ALT A and ALT B?
What if after fault we want to operate only 2P?
So we need both: Iinrush-2P and Iinrush total.
The text I'm working on would allow one pairset (4-pair power only) to violate the Iinrush-2p minimum by ~19% to account for E2EUNB as long as the sum of the two pairsets meets Iinrush.
Yair: This is OK in the case of Inrush-2P. With Iinrush total there is no need.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Yair Darshan <YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: