|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Yes, I am referring to this one.
Yair – I assume you are referring to the resolution of comment 210. That resolution was:
Adopt items 2 and 5 from the proposed remedy in Darshan_12_0916Rev003a.pdf
If you are referring to something else, please let us know.
George A. Zimmerman, Ph.D.
President & Principal Consultant
CME Consulting, Inc.
Experts in PHYsical Layer Communications
We agree to adopt schindler_02_0916.pdf.
In addition, based on Fred presentation, in my presentation darshan_12_0916.pdf that was dealing with the same subject, we agree to adopt part of the items that Fred’s presentation didn’t.
So it is perfectly OK to incorporate schindler_02_0916.pdf into D2.1 as we should have added this to the comment database.
All, during his draft revision, Lennart found that we forgot to include schindler_02_0916.pdf in the comment database. I have reviewed the minutes and found that Fred presented the slides and then we moved into comment resolution. Fred also has notes that Geoff objected to making a motion to incorporate and that it had to be in the comment database – and I recall this exchange in the meeting. So we found a comment to tie it to – and then forgot to put the filename in the comment.
I have reviewed the presentation again, it is non-controversial but stuff that definitely needs done. To say the least, we messed up in Fort Worth. In the interest of preventing new comments I am instructing Lennart to incorporate schindler_02_0916.pdf into D2.1 as we should have added this to the comment database.
If anyone has a problem with this, please speak up ASAP. The deadline to publish D2.1 looms.
Tech Lead, Cisco Systems
Chair, IEEE P802.3bt 4PPoE Task Force