|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Your editing instruction says "Change Table 145-17 as is".
That puts the editor in a really awkward position... do I change it ? Do I change it and change it back ?
On a more serious note, I would find it very unlikely anyone is going to bother testing unbalance with resistances precise down to the milliohm range.
Considering that resistors have a temperature coefficient that completely blasts the 1% precision away when exposed to the amount of current needed to test unbalance.
I would suggest the following roundings which actually make the range a bit wider:
0.087 => 0.08
0.101 => 0.1
5.41 => 5.4
6.25 => 6.3
Also, rounding RCH_unb_min/max but not rounding Rpd_min/max produces no net gain.
After all, the requirement is on the SUM of those resistances.
We also need to round Rpd_min and max.
Finally, Table 145-17 says "All resistances within 1% range" should say "+/- 1% range".
From: Yair Darshan <YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 15:41
Subject: [802.3_4PPOE] Comment #51 - TDL #129 Part A- Rounding resistor values in Table 145-17 to 1%
Please see attached. I’ll appreciate your review.
Chief R&D Engineer
Analog Mixed Signal Group
1 Hanagar St., P.O. Box 7220