| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Adding the reflector for everyone’s benefit. -TB From: Brillhart, Theodore Hello Dave, George, I'd like to comment on the proposed response to my comment #55. I would completely agree with the proposed response if my comment were specifying any requirements for cabling that weren’t already in the annex. However what I propose with
this comment is to simply translate the values for CM Vpp and DM Vpp that are listed in the table now, into their equivalent TCL values (i.e. TCL = 20Log10(CM/DM)). The cabling in this test set-up is the only significant source of mode conversion
and can be pre-tested to aid the user in setting up the experiment effectively the first time. No need to set the entire thing up, calibrate the clamp, take multiple measurements at the baluns only to find the CM/DM voltage requirements have not been met,
toss out the cabling, and start over. I’m very sorry if my comment did not make this clear to begin with. No new requirements. -Theo From: Chalupsky, David [mailto:david.chalupsky@xxxxxxxxx]
Dear Colleagues, Proposed comment responses for P802.3bq D2.3 and P802.3bz D1.1 are now posted. For both projects our editorial team has created an “EZ Bucket” of comments that we intend to approve with a single motion (one for each project). Please review the EZ bucket files. If you would like your comment removed from the EZ bucket and discussed separately, please notify me and our Chief Editor, George Zimmerman. P802.3bq comments:
http://www.ieee802.org/3/bq/comments/index.html P802.3bz comments:
http://www.ieee802.org/3/bz/comments/index.html Many thanks to the reviewers and to our editorial team for providing proposed responses. Thanks, David Chalupsky Chair, IEEE P802.3bq 25G/40GBASE-T Task Force Chair, IEEE P802.3bz 2.5G/5GBASE-T Task Force |