|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Agree, the plan sounds good. We could start to discuss how to produce and publish the models to help work for a task force.
This week we have agreed as a study group the PAR, CSD and objectives, but we are still in “Study Group” mode.
This means we can’t make any decision that binds the task force.
What we can do, is build consensus on what we want to do and how we want to do it.
I’d like to see us spend the next couple of months making sure that when we become a task force, we can move forwards rapidly. In my opinion, this includes getting consensus on:
1. how we will produce and publish models
2. how we want to conduct early informal reviews of models
3. an overall framework for how we want to structure the models (maybe this a model architecture?)
I think this is all good work that can get started now, and be ready to be adopted/confirms by the task force when it gets started.
Yan – what do you think?
802.3 YANG Data Model(s) Study Group Ad Hoc Chair
Not being well versed with IEEE processes, at this stage, what are the kind of contributions is the SG is looking for?
Are we still discussing PARs and CSDs, or are we at a point to start discussing YANG models? Or would it better to wait for PAR and CSD to be approved in the plenary, before discussing YANG models?