Re: [BP] Interference tolerance test channels
Charles,
Here is the presentation we discussed. Sorry for the late notice, as I
just got all done and approvals.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Moore [mailto:charles.moore@avagotech.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:07 PM
To: STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [BP] Interference tolerance test channels
rich,
Mellitz, Richard wrote:
>
>
> I'm also wrestling with the something else too. It seems that since we
> add interference to the EIT channel which effectively adds in return
> loss and crosstalk, why should AF max be the approximately the same
> since it does have return loss and via effects. Maybe we need a
> different line for EIT channel and AF max.
>
> ... Rich
>
I am not sure what you are getting at here. The Interference Test
channel includes
the injection module. It is up to the person doing the test to minimize
return loss
and via effects. He will be able to build a better one time fixture than
a mass produced
backplane and can stick to clean SMA connectors so those should be much
smaller
than on a interconnect channel.
charles
--
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Charles Moore
| Avago Technologies
| Image Solutions Division
| charles.moore@avagotech.com
| (970) 288-4561
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
dambrosia_c1_0106.pdf