Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements

relative to your comment:
>  An active architecture within the field isn general
>is not a good idea,

I'm not sure what you base this on, but for all intents and purposes every major deployment in existence has active components in the field. All-passive is in fact the "new idea" as is all optical. 

>  I would be extremely interested in discussing the
>active component network on different scale of
>operation as opposed to a PON as far as cost/ease of
>deployment and maintainence, complexity etc is

Agreed, I would too.

Get 250 color business cards for FREE!