Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [Fwd: [EFM] OAM transport...]

Agreed.  At some point the claims must be disclosed, and I was "asked to
ask" for disclosure as the proposals are evaluated.  The request didn't
seem unreasonable to me so I passed it on.

Martin Nuss wrote:
> Matt,
> If one or more company has intellectual property for either approach,
> each company is required to agree to license on fair, reasonable,
> reciprocal and non-discriminatory terms, any patent claims it owns
> covering such technology.
> Martin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Squire [mailto:mattsquire@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 3:43 PM
> To:
> Subject: [Fwd: [EFM] OAM transport...]
> I've been asked by a couple people to ask another question of the
> proponents of the any of the OAM transport mechanisms:
> 11) Can you comment on any intellectual property considerations of which
> the group should be informed?
> Thanks.
> - Matt