RE: [EFM] Re: OAM Transport Proposal
>
>I agree with your viewpoints on minor issues 1:5 except for the part
>where you say that OAM in Preamble is PHY specific. OAM in Preamble is
>architected to be PHY independent. It is architected to apply
>to as many
>optical and copper PHYs as possible while simultaneously being very
>"close" to the PHY for performance reasons.
>
I think we're on the same page. My comment was focused on a couple things:
a) the inapplicability of any use of the preamble to copper
b) the inapplicability of any preamble use to half-duplex
So I guess its "mostly" independent:)
- Matt