Re: [802.3] Financial Transparency On Interim Financing
Tom, I agree with you in principle. I believe that the financial reporting
done at the IEEE 802 plenary sessions should serve as a model for the
information that participants should be provided. If you do not believe
that the plenary financial disclosure is adequate (for example your
reference to a request to quote the market room rates for the hotel) then
you should first take that type of issue up at the 802 plenary, rather than
try to create a different set of criteria for the financial information
disclosed at interim meetings.
Robert D. Love
President, Resilient Packet Ring Alliance
President, LAN Connect Consultants
7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
email: rdlove@xxxxxxxx Fax: 208 978-1187
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Dineen" <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "Thomas Dineen"
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:37 PM
Subject: [802.3] Financial Transparency On Interim Financing
> Gentle People:
> Given the admonishment posted the reflector in the
> last few days by our esteemed chair a question and a
> potential new requirement for financial transparency
> comes to mind.
> Should there be more disclosure of the financing
> of Interim meetings? In cases where the host bears
> the whole cost I would think not as this would be
> a private matter.
> But what about cases where the membership is
> requested to pay a meeting fee or pay an increased
> hotel room rate for the meeting? In cases where the
> membership is requested to pay all or part of the
> meeting fees I would think is is appropriate to
> require the full disclosure or the details of the
> meeting financing!
> Such details would include:
> -Sources or revenue:
> - The amount of host subsitity if any.
> - The amount of fee increment added to the hotel
> room rate above the market rate of the room.
> -Spending structure:
> - Meeting room rental.
> - Equipment costs.
> - Catering costs if any.
> The bottom line is that if the individual members
> are paying for the meeting with their fees they have
> a right to know these financing details.
> What do you think?
> Thomas Dineen