RE: AW: [EFM] PON Optics Telephone Conference, December 5th
I agree with Ariel's response. This issue has more to do with cycle
time than PMD parameters.
Richard Brand wrote:
> I would offer that Roy's note does not answer question 1
> and I have sent a note
> to Roy to detail. As Kent is aware, there is an ongoing
> project in the MEF
> right now to specify circuit services (read TDM including
> T1) over Ethernet
> including 802.3 networks.
> The timing issue could be critical to some
> implementations and is one of the
> reasons I voted "no" in Kauai. Vipal, do you want to take it on?
> Richard Brand