Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements

To: bob.barrett@fourthtrack.com
Subject: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@gwi.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:45:02 -0400
cc: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>, "Sherman Ackley" <SAckley@nrtc.org>, "stds-802-3-efm" <stds-802-3-efm@ieee.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Aug 2001 21:21:20 BST." <NFBBIIGLOGBFPMGAJKKEIEODDEAA.bob.barrett@fourthtrack.com>
Reply-To: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>, "Sherman Ackley" <SAckley@nrtc.org>
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-efm@majordomo.ieee.org

On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 21:21:20 +0100  "Bob Barrett" wrote:
> The reason that the cable modem market 'works' is that the cable modem is a
> well defined demarcation point.
> 
> The EFM copper modem must be as 'user proof' as a cable modem.

DOCSIS; it is a good standard.  If it were me, I would make my EFM
modem be as much like a DOCSIS cable modem as possible.

regards,
fletcher

References:
- RE: [EFM] EFM Requirements
  - From: Bob Barrett

Prev by Date: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Next by Date: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements [really Oregon Trail Etherloop?]
Prev by thread: RE: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Next by thread: Re: [EFM] EFM Requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread