|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Bob and all WG members,
Again, I apologize for the inappropriate use of language. Please note that the phrasing of my earlier statement was unintentional, and was merely to support Dan’s proposals. I have no intention to cause anger or insult to anyone, and if I have, I would like to apologize again.
Please excuse my English as I do not live in the States, and I am not aware of the intricacies of American culture.
From: Grow, Bob
Statements such as you present below are totally inappropriate. Such a statement can be asserted to be anti-competitive with consequent risks to anyone making such a statement or endorsing it.
Vice Chair, IEEE-SA Standards Board
Chair, IEEE 802.3 Working Group
Cheok Kiang Kho [mailto:dkho@ALTERA.COM]
I support the content of your presentation; and its motions to block a 40G PAR going forward, and to expedite efforts on 100G.
From: Dove, Dan
Subsequent to yesterday's debate, I feel it is necessary to address some of the issues raised in a formally documented manner.
I have produced a presentation which I have requested authorization to present at today's meeting. If you support the content of this presentation, please reply back to me asap.
I am open to feedback as well.