Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [8023-POEP] Solved another problem with DS



Hi Steve,

 

I believe I understand the problem you are showing and I still think that the solution is a bit complex to the problem presented and I would like to explain more on this issue:

 

  1. The problem is about a 2P MP PD connected to a system which consist of af-End span connected to at-Midspan on the same 4P cable.
  2. According to 802.3af af-Endspan will win the race for valid detection however PD will fail to power due to an overload condition associated with PD indication.
  3. The possible solutions for this case are:

3.1    IT manager when connected at-Midspan to at Endspan disable ends pan power. This is simple and straightforward and within IT manager responsibilities to connect the system segments to function properly. If we want that it will be done automatically then we can use 3.2.

3.2    In this alternative an at –Midspan will issue n detection and classification tests right after first detection of invalid signature until valid signature is obtained. This is a change to the 802.3af concept that allowed the Endspan to win the detection race.

We can play with the numbers of detection trials and timing etc and it is not important now. What I am trying to emphasis is to use current tools that we have in the 802.3af without loading the hardware with extra functions which will complicate the PSE chip and increase its cost.

 

We have to remember that not every problem we have to solve. We need to decide first if this is a problem that is within our scope or not.

If we can solve it as in 3.1 without adding more functions to the PSE, I would prefer such solution.

 

Yair

 

    

 


From: owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Robbins
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 5:59 PM
To: STDS-802-3-POEP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [8023-POEP] Solved another problem with DS

 

Yair,

 

I think you missed the point.

 

The solution is NOT to “…mandate separate signatures for each 2P…” because we also want “medium power” on 2P.  The Task Force already agreed to this.

 

So there will be some PDs in the 15W to 30W(?) range that have an input structure like an Af-PD (SS with diode bridges).

 

The obvious upgrade path for a user would be to add a medium-power At-midspan in-line with his existing Af-endspan.  These two PSEs can’t share the load since the PD is SS.  So the At-midspan has to supplant (take the place of) the Af-endspan.

 

I showed a method to assure the midspan will power the MP PD every time.  I think this will be essential to the 802.3at standard.

 

Steve

 


From: Yair Darshan [mailto:YairD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 4:11 AM
To: Steve Robbins; STDS-802-3-POEP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [8023-POEP] Solved another problem with DS

 

Steve and all,

 

The problem shown in this presentation can be easily solved by mandating detection and classification signature for every 2P in the PD.

Specifically separate signatures for each 2P and not a common one as measured at the RJ45.

See attached presentation in page 13 for the proposed scope of work.

This is the idea of how standard can be simplified.

Doing the above is not requiring any special specifications from the PSE.

The Endspan PSE will detect and classify pair A.

The Midspan PSE will detect and classify pair B.

Both channels will turned on within the current 802.3af timings or similar to it.

Since each channel A and B are not tied together at the diode bridge output, the PD can be operated easily by using the PD circuitry which is TBD (implementation independent).

 

Yair

 

 

 


From: owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Robbins
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:14 AM
To: STDS-802-3-POEP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [8023-POEP] Solved another problem with DS

 

Guys,

 

I think I’ve solved another problem that’s inherent with DS.  See the attached pdf.  (Only about 10 more tough problems to go!) 

 

I’d sure appreciate some comments.

 

Steve