Re: Boredom
Larry
>
>C'mon, dude, this is engineering! Enough of this THIS IS IT:
DEAL WITH IT
>jazz, already.
I agree with your point above completely -- which is why I'm having
problems with those on this list bashing a proposed option here while
still admitted they have nothing to base in on scientifically....
I don't think "THIS IS IT", even though I work for
that same company. I just don't like the idea of engineers admitting they
are using flawed and incomplete data when taking a position (the list
email archive proves this to be true)....
>
>Regards,
>
>Larry Miller
>
>
>At 11:17 AM 5/9/00 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>>Hi
>>
>>Don't tell anyone- but I am bored- really.
>>
>>let's go, what happened to the 1000BT -like wrestling? over
the reflector,
>>I was promised that this would be fun, and so far nothing,
nothing proves
>>that.
>>
>>I would really flame someone, or impose my ideas on you but
at this point
>>I shall speak for at least myself at CISCO (likely for a lot
of us), what
>is important to me in this
>>standard is having a spec that an engineer understands when
he/she
>>will read it without calling everyone that was present
at the meeting and
>>still be confused about it. And having a
standard that is engineering
>friendly
>>to the customer and myself, from a
design/test/reliability/usability
>standpoint.
>>
>>otherwise, let's send in the MBA's they can do a much better
job
>>at agendas and business flare ups, and at setting up rules
for what is
>>and what is not right.
>>my 2c,
>>roger
>>
>
*************************************
"At the end of the day... the most committed win!"
James M. Polk
Sr. Product Manager, Multiservice Architecture and Standards
Enterprise Voice Business Unit
Cisco Systems
Dallas, Texas
w) 972.813.5208
f) 972.813.5280
www.cisco.com