Re: [802.3af] Category 6 cabling
As far as 1000 Base-T is concerned, I believe they wrote it
for Category 5 with the intent that it will definitely work
with Category 6 and 7 as well. However I know little of
the issues of 802.3af with Cat 6 and 7 cable. I would
assume it is similar though.
--
************************************************************
Timothy R. Plunkett, code B35
Building 1500A Room 110
Naval Surface Warfare Center - Dahlgren Division
17320 Dahlgren Rd.
Dahlgren, VA 22448-5100
(540) 653 - 1090 (phone at Dahlgren)
(540) 653 - 8673 (fax at Dahlgren)
"James M. Polk" wrote:
>
> Paul
>
> I believe 100BASE TX is written to Category 5. The same I believe is true
> for GigE. Cat 6 and 7 aren't written into either spec... so I don't know if
> the IEEE has a charter to address this (them?) directly, but is likely
> deemed 'out of scope' since a non-conformant infrastructure is being used
> in either case...
>
> I could be wrong here though
>
> At 09:57 AM 5/15/2002 -0700, McMillan, Paul wrote:
> >
> >Hello All,
> >
> >As a follow on question that I made earlier, Has anyone been faced with
> >potential warranty issues from cabling manufacturers? Specifically,
> >manufacturers referencing channel to channel certification being voided if
> >power is applied over the cabling infrastructure. This is specific to a
> >category 6 wiring implementation. This leads to a more obvious question
> >which is everything I have read on the 802.3af specification references
> >category 5 cabling. I assume the category 6 or 7 cabling is addressed.
> >
> > Regards
> >Paul McMillan
> >Solutions Architect
> >CCDA
> >Siemens Enterprise Networks
> >Penn-Jersey Region
> >RNET 590-3527
> >Outside (610)-660-3527
> >
> >> This message and any attachments are solely for the use of intended
> >> recipients. They may contain confidential information to Siemens. If you
> >> are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you received
> >> this email in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution or
> >> copying of this email and any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> >> have received this email in error, please contact the sender and delete
> >> the message and any attachment from your system. Thank you for your
> >> cooperation.
> >
> >
>
> *************************************
> "People generally demand more respect for their own rights than they are
> willing to allow for others"
>
> James M. Polk
> Senior Consulting Engineer
> Office of the CTO
>
> Cisco Systems
> 2200 East President George Bush Turnpike
> Richardson, TX 75082 USA
> w) 972.813.5208
> f) 972.813.5280
> www.cisco.com