Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802.3af] Public acquiescence


You unsubscribe.  Instructions are at:

Bob Grow
Chair, IEEE 802.3 Working Group

-----Original Message-----
From: Mehran Ataee [mailto:mehran@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:13 AM
To: scarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mike_S_McCormack@xxxxxxxx; stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [802.3af] Public acquiescence

Dear Steve,
I hope you have been well.
How do I get myself off of the 802.3af email list ( all of them). thanks,

At 10:26 PM 10/7/2002 -0700, Steve Carlson wrote:

>With grateful thanks to Mike for his reasoned and elegant acquiescence, I
>can now state that there are NO unsatisfied TR's against 802.3af. I will
>instruct the Comment Editor to change the status from "U" to "C" with
>"Commenter Accepts" on Comments 17 and 18 in D3.2.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
>Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:46 PM
>To: stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: [802.3af] Public acquiescence
>After much soul searching and with consultation with Steve, I determined
>that the appropriate thing to do at this time is to accept the committee's
>resolution to my low wattage PSE comments 17 and 18.   This e-mail, I
>believe will allow the editors / chairman to close them.
>However . . . I do intend to (you can read this as a "shall" statement)
>submit a similar comment about the failure of the spec to meet a real
>market need during the sponsor ballot, its just that the best interests of
>all require a step forward.  I would suggest to all that the time may have
>come to gather the troops and move to the next battlefield; you, of course,
>are allowed to make this decision on your own.
>Steve - I believe you can now say with complete honestly that there are no
>outstanding unresolved TRs?

----- End Included Message -----