RE: [802.3af] Late comment
You are correct.
I believe that the committee accepted the late comment as:
of consideration and inclusion into the comment database for
That was all that I was looking for at the time.
I also believe that the status of this particular comment is that it has
not yet been actually considered by the Comment Resolution Group.
The purpose of my message was so that the comment had a paper trail and
would actually get put into the comment database (with fair warning) and
be up for formal resolution at the Santa Clara meeting.
Thanks for putting it where it belongs.
At 09:11 AM 1/14/2003 -0500, you wrote:
My 2 cents -
In reply to the assertion that the committee agree there was a
that is not how I remember it. I remember that the committee agreed
worth further consideration and would agree to adding a late comment
facilitate the inquiry. Was there a comment added that was accepted
accepted in principle that I don't remember?
If we choose to go down the path to specifying ground, there is impact
clauses 14, 25, and 40 at a minimum, I would suggest that we may as
open up clauses 9 and 27 as well and straighten out those. I would
that proposed change text be prepared and circulated prior to the
Are we talking specifying a common or ground?
I hope all that I am talking about is specifying which end of the primary
power is the common.