Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802.3af] comment #178



Colleagues: anyone have thoughts on this comment?  I’m not sure which way to go with this comment.

 

-----------

CommentID:  178

CommenterName:  Thaler, Pat

CommenterEmail:  pat_thaler@xxxxxxxxxxx

CommenterPhone:  916-788-5663

CommenterFax: 

CommenterCo:  Agilent Technologies

Clause:  33

Subclause:  33.2.3.2

Page:  41

Line:  46

CommentType:  E

 

Comment: 

It would be more reader friendly to have the value match the class number that is supported. It also isn't clear why Classes 3 and 4 are lumped together. Also, it isn't clear why the last value isn't simply Class 3 since the text says it is the highest power supported. Class 4 is currently undefined but the table says it is limited to the same max power as Class 3. Class 0 means that the power will be less than or equal to Class 3. Therefore the highest power would be Class 3.

 

Same comment applies to do_classification on page 42 line 44

CommentEnd: 

 

SuggestedRemedy: 

Values: 1   Class 1

        2   Class 2

        3   Class 3

RemedyEnd: 

 

Response: 

 

ResponseEnd: 

CommentStatus:  X

ResponseStatus:  O

Topic: 

CreateDate:  1/2/2003

LastModDate:  1/2/2003

DispatchDate: 

WrittenDate: 

Accept_RejectDate: 

Closed_UnsatisfDate: 

VoterStatus:

 

Chad Jones                                    cmjones@xxxxxxxxx

Hardware Engineer                        Phone: 330-664-7818

WNBU Engineering                        Fax: 330-664-7990

Cisco Systems

320 Springside Drive

Suite 350

Akron, OH 44333-4500                  www.cisco.com