Re: [802.3af] efficent PSEs
At 02:47 PM 1/23/2003 -0500, Mike_S_McCormack@xxxxxxxx wrote:
If we are breaking to opinion pieces, I can't
Why am I not surprised :^)> ?
A) I want to finish, I do not want to have a
plan that keeps me attending
for years to come.
Me too, therefore no change.
I like you guys, but I don't know how many
dissertations on how to sign the attendance books I can
I (or my successor) will be happy to put in the change without your
smiling face, "when the time comes".
2) I heard the stories about how after
Ethernet was running over fiber it
would be so cheap nobody would want a high speed copper solution.
guess what, that did not happen, the market demands cheap, and so
working group is assembled in fire drill fashion to keep 10GE from
into unspecified market mayhem. Ethernet wasn't an 800 pound
I would be willing to bet that Ethernet is the 800 pound gorilla in
fiber. It is just that one 800 pound gorilla doesn't have a chance
against the thunder herd of elephants that is copper Ethernet.
it will not be an 800 pound power supply
* The market is trained NOW to look at power supplies to determine if
are appropriate for the application. Who will be the first to bring
fact that users expect 100% operational compatibility when the two
window expires and we allow ourselves to become cost effective?
IV) I would like to know who has gone to their marketing department
gotten the OK to increase the cost of their power supply, not for the
of their own products, but for the benefit of end users who are bent
using it for other products.
We have precedence for labeling and it is well within our purview.
should complete our task NOW and not plan on leaving a mess to clean
This all comes down to opinion about which is best.
At this point, I think everybody has all of the information they need to
make their decision.
We need to use the process, determine the outcome and move on.