RE: Dan- Again (response)
Hi Dan
I am gonna get busy here and try to deliver some input
(measurements at the meeting). No intent to waste anyone's time here.
At this point I voiced my opinions...
and I am a bit surprised to see this "decided", "objectives", and you shipped
a head song and dance come up over and over. These are the words that normally
sound "Non Technical" for a lack of a better word
to me, I delivered 10 reasons to use the signal pair, and so far the
only arguments that I can see against that are:
0- The magnetic won't work (we can prove that it does)
1- you shipped, propietary stuff, so it is not good, mine because it is in the
lab still, is better. I don't want to hear that you passed all these other things (EMI... SPECS)
irrelevant, propietary stuff, bad for all of us. We were never out to force a solution on
the group, and for sure we can improve our scheme change it, and deliver an industry
solution to make life easier for all of us. FYI, I don't feel guilty for delivering a product
nor do I owe anyone an apology. And please remind me of a single statement made verbal
or otherwise on my part that shows disrespect for anyone's solutions or saying that
Cisco's way is the way, I still beleive that what we have is valuable and given open
mindedness on the part of the group can be put to good use.
2- The comittee decided on x y z objectives. and for sure that excludes what you beleive in.
I enjoyed interacting with eveyone here and got to know you and Larry a little better,
as you can tell I am new to the game here, but grateful to be a techie ....
see u there,
roger