Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

RE: [802SEC] Bad press Re: pre-std "g" equipment

To: pat_thaler@agilent.com
Subject: RE: [802SEC] Bad press Re: pre-std "g" equipment
From: Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:30:24 +0000
Cc: mjsherman@research.att.com, r.b.marks@ieee.org, stds-802-sec@ieee.org
In-Reply-To: <1BEBA5E8600DD4119A50009027AF54A010F3764D@axcs04.cos.agilent.com>
Sender: owner-stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org


At 10:10 18/02/2003 -0700, pat_thaler@agilent.com wrote:

>Speaking from the perspective of an older working group, there are good 
>reasons that the maintenance process is not faster. It is fairly easy to 
>spot a problem and quickly make a change that makes things worse 
>especially when there is already a lot of equipment deployed.

Pat -

I agree.


Regards,
Tony

References:
- RE: [802SEC] Bad press Re: pre-std "g" equipment
  - From: pat_thaler@agilent.com

Prev by Date: Re: [802SEC] +++ SEC EMAIL BLLOT +++ MOTION: Authorize the Link Security Exec SG to become an 802.1 SG
Next by Date: RE: [802SEC] Bad press Re: pre-std "g" equipment
Prev by thread: RE: [802SEC] Bad press Re: pre-std "g" equipment
Next by thread: RE: [802SEC] Bad press Re: pre-std "g" equipment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread