Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802SEC] 802-SEC reflector delay




Maybe it's time to call Luigi Napoli at IEEE-HQ for a reading on what is going on with their mail server ???

Thanx,  Buzz
Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing - SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA  98124-2207
(425) 865-2443    Fx: (425) 865-6721
everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Heile [mailto:bheile@ieee.org] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:51 AM
To: Rigsbee, Everett O; Bill Quackenbush; IEEE 802 SEC
Subject: RE: [802SEC] 802-SEC reflector delay

Buzz

I have had exactly the same experience as  Bill recently. When I announced 
the Network meeting in DFW, I knew  some of you got it since I got 
replies.  I did not get my copy for 4 days.  I resent it with direct names 
because I had no idea who got it and who did not.

Bob





At 03:01 PM 3/20/03 -0800, Rigsbee, Everett O wrote:

>Bill,  Two interesting things that I note from this:
>
>1.  You 2nd message actually arrived before the 1st message arrived, so 
>service is not even FIFO.
>
>2.  Your 2nd message took 40 minutes just to get to IEEE.
>
>It looks to me like your local email server is experiencing some serious 
>difficulties.  It's your SMTP not your KARMA !!!   :-)
>
>Thanx,  Buzz
>Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
>Boeing - SSG
>PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
>Seattle, WA  98124-2207
>(425) 865-2443    Fx: (425) 865-6721
>everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:billq@attglobal.net]
>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:23 PM
>To: IEEE 802 SEC
>Subject: [802SEC] 802-SEC reflector delay
>
>
>All,
>
>I recognize that some/many/most of you may have little interest in this
>topic, but I find my recent experience with my emails on "802.20
>affirmation" rather curious.
>
>As you probably know, I sent an email on the above topic Tuesday and
>then resent the email on Wednesday as I had not received my copy for the
>initial email from the 802-SEC reflector.  I have now received my copy
>from both transmissions, but after significant delays (> 34 hours and >
>13 hours).  Just for amusement, I asked Buzz Rigsbee for his copies on
>the emails.  The total end to end delays for his copies were both under
>7 minutes.  (The delays times were extracted from the complete email
>headers.  All times were converted to GMT.)  The details are in the
>following table
>
>Any thoughts?  Maybe I have the wrong karma.
>
>Thanks,
>
>wlq
>
>
>
>In the following table, dates are in the format YYMMDD and
>times are in the format HH:MM:SS.  All event times are GMT.
>
>
>             Initial     Initial     Resent      Resent
>Event/      email to    email to    email to    email to
>Item        wlq         Buzz        wlq         Buzz
>------      --------    --------    --------    --------
>
>Sent        030318      030318      030319      030319
>             19:11:55    19:11:55    15:16:29    15:16:29
>
>Received    030318      030318      030319      030319
>by 802-SEC  19:12:02    19:12:02    15:56:32    15:56:32
>reflector
>
>Received    030320      030318      030320      030319
>from        05:32:08    19:17:42    05:24:23    15:59:07
>802-SEC
>reflector
>
>Last        030320      030318      030320      030320
>timestamp   05:32:08    19:18:28    05:24:23    15:59:15
>in header
>
>
>Total path  34:20:13    00:06:33    13:27:54    00:02:46
>delay
>
>802-SEC     34:20:06    00:05:40    13:27:51    00:02:35
>reflector
>delay



Bob Heile, Ph.D
Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
Chair, ZigBee Alliance
11 Louis Road
Attleboro, MA  02703   USA
Phone: 508-222-1393
Mobile: 781-929-4832
Fax: 	    508-222-0515
email:   bheile@ieee.org