Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Fwd: 1 Week delay on note posted to reflector




Forwarded for a non-subscriber.

 -Bob
 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Matthew Persons" <m.persons@ieee.org>
To: "Howard Frazier" <millardo@dominetsystems.com>
Cc: <l.napoli@ieee.org>, "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>,
   <nbisiolu@ieee.org>, "spa-admin" <spa-admin@ieee.org>,
<k.rupp@ieee.org>,
   <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>, <j.longman@ieee.org>, <a.ortiz@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Fwd: 1 Week delay on note posted to reflector
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:31:43 -0400


Howard,

    You will still control the lists in the same manner as before.  The
new
server will receive the changes and from the current system.


Matt Persons



---- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Frazier" <millardo@dominetsystems.com>
To: "Matthew Persons" <m.persons@ieee.org>
Cc: <l.napoli@ieee.org>; "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>;
<nbisiolu@ieee.org>; "spa-admin" <spa-admin@ieee.org>;
<k.rupp@ieee.org>;
<stds-802-sec@ieee.org>; <j.longman@ieee.org>; <a.ortiz@ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Fwd: 1 Week delay on note posted to reflector



Okay,

Do I have to do anything different, or do I still
control the list using majordomo@ieee.org and MajorCool?

Howard

Matthew Persons wrote:

> The stds-802-3-efm list has been moved over to the new server.
>
> Matt Persons
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Frazier" <millardo@dominetsystems.com>
> To: <l.napoli@ieee.org>
> Cc: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>;
<nbisiolu@ieee.org>;
> "spa-admin" <spa-admin@ieee.org>; <k.rupp@ieee.org>;
> <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>; <j.longman@ieee.org>; <a.ortiz@ieee.org>;
> <m.persons@ieee.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Fwd: 1 Week delay on note posted to reflector
>
>
>
> Luigi,
>
> I would be pleased to move my stds-802-3-efm list
> over and be a guinea pig.  It will be a good test, since
> there will be a lot of activity on that reflector in
> the coming week. I'll wait to move my other four reflectors
> over, because they are administered by four of my
> sub task force chairmen, so I don't have direct control
> over them.
>
> Congratulations on getting the new server up and running
> on schedule!
>
> Howard
>
> Luigi Napoli wrote:
>
>
>>Howard,
>>
>>To follow up on the majordomo delay problems, the second majordomo
server
>>is now up and running.  We will test it for a couple of days using
some
>>staff majordomo mailing lists.  The working group mailing lists will
then
>>be migrated over, which should be around the middle of next week.
I'll
>>let you know.  However, if you'd like to add one of your lists to the
>>test today, we can certainly do that.  So far the staff lists seem to
be
>>running fine and messages tagged as spam are being sent only to the
>>owner of the list.
>>
>>Thanks for your patience.
>>
>>- Luigi
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Howard Frazier wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Geoff,
>>>
>>>We have been working on the problem. Relief is expected within
>>>a couple of days. Please refer to the following message in
>>>the SEC reflector archive for the details:
>>>
>>>http://www.ieee802.org/secmail/msg03697.html
>>>
>>>Howard
>>>
>>>Geoff Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Folks-
>>>>
>>>>Enclosed is an example, with date stamps, of a message to an 802
>>>>reflector that I received today. Please note that the delivery delay
was
>>>>only a half an our short of ONE FULL WEEK!
>>>>
>>>>If this were a single instance occurrence it would be, perhaps,
>>>>excusable but this has been going on for an extended length of time.
My
>>>>records show first e-mails on the topic over 9 weeks ago.
>>>>
>>>>It is obvious that this is not acceptable and that an e-mail system
that
>>>>performs at this level can not be considered to be meeting the
>>>>reasonable expectations that IEEE members have for conducting
business
>>>>by e-mail. In this case, the meeting in question had been scheduled
for
>>>>Tuesday, April 29, the day before the message finally arrived.
>>>>
>>>>Please advise us on what we can do to remedy this situation or how
you
>>>>are prepared to bring IEEE mail service to an acceptable and useful
>>>>level. It is my belief that if you can not provide a satisfactory
>>>>response then we will have no choice but to make other arrangements.
>>>>
>>>>Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>>Geoff Thompson
>>>>SB Member, Vice Chair, IEEE 802
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Received: from zcars0ms.ca.nortel.com ([47.129.242.180]) by
>>>>>zsc3c028.us.nortel.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
>>>>>Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
>>>>>       id 2R1CKHW5; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:58:29 -0700
>>>>>Received: from ecarshhh.nortelnetworks.com
>>>>>(ecarshhh.nortelnetworks.com [47.248.0.32])
>>>>>       by zcars0ms.ca.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with
>>>>>SMTP id h3UGwL117976;
>>>>>       Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>>Received: from ruebert.ieee.org (ruebert.ieee.org [140.98.193.10])
by
>>>>>ecarshhh.nortelnetworks.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.5); Wed, 30
Apr
>>>>>2003 12:54:10 -0400
>>>>>Received: (from daemon@localhost)
>>>>>       by ruebert.ieee.org (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.6) id
h3NI0oK19370
>>>>>       for stds-802-3-pwrviamdi-resent; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:00:59
>>>>>-0400 (EDT)
>>>>>Message-Id:
<4.2.0.58.20030423100433.035baf10@zsc3c026.us.nortel.com>
>>>>>X-Sender: gthompso@zsc3c026.us.nortel.com
>>>>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
>>>>>Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:29:40 -0700
>>>>>To: "Goldis, Moty (Moty)" <mgoldis@avaya.com>
>>>>>From: "Thompson, Geoff
[SC100:321:EXCH]"<gthompso@americasm06.nt.com>
>>>>>Subject: [802.3af] Re: Hotel in the area for 28/4/03
>>>>>Cc: "Thompson, Geoff
[SC100:321:EXCH]"<gthompso@americasm06.nt.com>,
>>>>>  stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@ieee.org
>>>>>In-Reply-To:
<AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0385DD5A@is0004avexu1.glob
>>>>>al.avaya.com>
>>>>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>>>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>>>>       boundary="=====================_8109320==_.ALT"
>>>>>Sender: owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@majordomo.ieee.org
>>>>>Precedence: bulk
>>>>>X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients
>>>>>
> <stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@majordomo.ieee.org>
>
>>>>>X-Listname: stds-802-3-pwrviamdi
>>>>>X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to  majordomo@majordomo.ieee.org
>>>>>X-Moderator-Address:
stds-802-3-pwrviamdi-approval@majordomo.ieee.org
>>>>>X-SMTP-HELO: ruebert.ieee.org
>>>>>X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: owner-stds-802-3-pwrviamdi@majordomo.ieee.org
>>>>>X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: [DELETED]
>>>>>X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: ruebert.ieee.org [140.98.193.10]
>>>>>
>>>>>Moty-
>>>>>
>>>>>Regarding hotels near the (potential) meeting site, both the:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hilton Santa Clara              (new, about 1 year old) 4949
Great
>>>>>American Parkway Santa Clara, CA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>and
>>>>>
>>>>>The Westin Santa Clara 5101 Great America Pkwy Santa Clara, CA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>are within easy walking distance (between 5 & 8 minutes) of Nortel
>>>>>(they are immediately north at the corner of Tasman & Gt America).
>>>>>Both of them are also immediately adjacent to a streetcar stop to
take
>>>>>you to either downtown San Jose or downtown Mountain View. I know
the
>>>>>Hilton has a free airport shuttle. The Westin doesn't seem to.
>>>>>
>>>>>Also within walking distance to the south is:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Santa Clara Marriott    (free airport shuttle to/from San Jose)
>>>>>   2700 Mission College Boulevard (at the corner of Great America
>>>>>   Parkway) Santa Clara, CA 95054
>>>>>
>>>>>   Phone: 408 988 1500 Fax: 408 727 4353 Web:
www.marriotthotels.com
>>>>><http://www.marriotthotels.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>and
>>>>>
>>>>>   Holiday Inn     (free airport shuttle to/from San Jose) 4200
GREAT
>>>>>   AMERICA PARKWAY SANTA CLARA, CA 95054-1210 UNITED STATES
>>>>>Toll-Free: 1800-5865691 Tel: 1-408-2358900 Fax: 1-408-9880976
>>>>>
>>>>>After these four you pretty much will need a car unless you come
from
>>>>>some less obvious and more distant hotel and take public transit.
>>>>>There are an enormous number of hotels in the area that service
both
>>>>>the business needs of Silicon Valley and the recreational travelers
to
>>>>>Great America Amusement Park (next door to us). Of the 3 above I
would
>>>>>say they all are typical business grade hotels and you should pick
>>>>>
>>>>>from them based on what sort of web deal you can get. The Holiday
Inn
>>>>
>>>>>caters to a more recreational crowd.
>>>>>
>>>>>I hope this helps.
>>>>>
>>>>>Geoff
>>>>>
>>>>>At 02:10 PM 4/22/2003 +0300, Goldis, Moty (Moty) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Geoff,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Can you please recommend on hotel near the meeting location?
>>>>>>Enjoy some pictures from the plug fest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Regards ,
>>>>>>Mordechai
>>>>>>___________
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Mordechai Goldis
>>>>>>972-3-6458425
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>|=========================================|
>>>>
>>>>| Geoffrey O. Thompson                    |
>>>>
>>>>| Vice Chair,  IEEE 802                   |
>>>>
>>>>| Nortel Networks, Inc.  M/S: P79/06/B04  |
>>>>
>>>>| 4655 Great America Parkway              |
>>>>
>>>>| P. O. Box 58185                         |
>>>>
>>>>| Santa Clara, CA 95052-8185  USA         |
>>>>
>>>>| Phone: +1 408 495 1339                  |
>>>>
>>>>| Fax:   +1 408 495 5615                  |
>>>>
>>>>| E-Mail: thompson@ieee.org               |
>>>>
>>>>| Please see the IEEE 802 web page at     |
>>>>
>>>>| http://www.ieee802.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>