Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot - Proposed Resolution +++ AudCom



As a reminder we will hold the usual LMSC P&P review meeting this Sunday
night.  Attached is a proposed resolution to comments on the AudCom
ballot as a starting point for discussions on Sunday.  The primary
agenda item for Sunday will be to come to consensus on a resolution for
the AudCom ballot.  If you can't make the meeting and have comments on
the proposed resolution please forward them to the reflector for
discussion.  I will consider all comments circulated during the Sunday
P&P review.  Also, please be prepared to discuss the issues on the
Chair's Guide as well on Sunday.  We will discuss that topic as time
allows after we complete discussions on the AudCom revision ballot.


As much as possible, I have accepted the comments people made.  In some
cases, I tried to improve upon the desired changes a bit.  In a few
cases, I did not accept the requested change as I did not beleive with
the rationale provided was valid.  Here is a short list of the comment
sets and key differences in my proposed resolutions:


Stuart's comments - Fully incorporated

Steve's comment - I disagree that EC cannot make technical decisions.  I
adopted your other changes.

                        Added Parliamentarian as non-voting, but that
may make Bob O'Hara want to reconsider being parliamentarian...

                        I snuck in emeritus.  Perhaps it is time that we
officially recognize Geoff's non-voting status....


John Lemon's comments - Adopted all except 

                        I believe it is common parliamentary practice
for the chair not to make motions


Roger's comments

                        Once again, yes, the EC CAN DEAL WITH TECHNICAL

                                    See 7.1.1 Function  'Provide
procedural and, if necessary, technical guidance to the 

Working Groups and Technical Advisory Groups as it relates to their

                        Non members can't formally be entitled to have
things considered.  But I agree on right of Appeal for everyone


Pat's comments

                        Again, we can deal with technical issues!

                        Since some 'procedural votes' such as call the
question are 66%, let's just reference Roberts Rules.

                        Your thoughts on appointed positions not voting
conflicts with other EC members

                                    For now I've gone with the other
view point

                        I don't understand your comment on moving Vice
Chairs serving as Chairs.


Tony's comments

                        See alternate resolutions based on comments from
other EC members


Mike Lynch

                        See Alternate resolutions


Thanks and Regards to all,




Matthew Sherman, Ph.D. 
Engineering Fellow 
BAE Systems -  Network Systems (NS) 
Office: +1 973.633.6344 
Cell: +1 973.229.9520 



This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.

802.0-AudCom_-_LMSC_P&P_Proposed Resolution_070711.pdf