[802SEC] FW: RE: [802SEC] +++10 day Ballot+++opensMarc06Closes March16
Pat has pointed out that I negleted to add some editorial changes suggested by Geoff that add clarity. I have attached the voting proceedure including the editorial clarificatrions for your review.
The status of the current vote is as follows:
Ch: Paul Nikolich - DNV
ES: Buzz Rigsbee - Approve
RS: Bob O'Hara - Approve
TR: John Hawkins - Approve
01: Tony Jeffree - Approve
15: Bob Heile - Approve
17: John Lemon - Approve
18: Mike Lynch - Approve
20: Arnie Greenspan- Approve
Dear EC Members,
The 802 Chair, Paul Nikolich, has delegated the conduct of the following motion via 802 EC email ballot to me, Arnie Greenspan.
Moved: The Unconflicted 802 EC members approve the attached voting
procedure to be used for 802.20 WG officer selection during the March 2008 Plenary.
Opens: 06 MAR 2008; Closes 16 MAR2008
Mover: Arnie Greenspan
Seconder: Buzz Rigsbee
Unconflicted EC (UC EC) members regarding 802.20 WG matters are eligible to cast a ballot on this issue.
UC EC Voters:
CH Paul Nikolich
ES Buzz Rigsbee
RS Bob O'Hara
TR John Hawkins
01 Tony Jeffree
15 Bob Heile
17 John Lemon
18 Mike Lynch
20 Arnie Greenspan
ME Geoff Thompson non-voting
EC members not eligible to vote:
V1 Mat Sherman
V2 Pat Thaler
03 Bob Grow
11 Stuart Kerry
16 Roger Marks
19 Steve Shellhammer
21 Vivek Gupta
22 Carl Stevenson
-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From: "Pat Thaler" <email@example.com>
Subject: RE: [802SEC] +++10 day Ballot+++opensMarc06Closes March16
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:15:34 +0000
I saw that you made the change to item 4 that answered the question Geoff asked in his email. I think you missed that he also attached a copy of the procedure with editorial changes. For example in item 1 he changed "membership" to "individual members". I think his changes added clarity without changing the content.
I have attached a copy of the file he sent with his mark-ups.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:38 AM
To: Pat Thaler
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++10 day Ballot+++opensMarc06Closes March16
If you will check item 4 on the attached proceedure I think that you will find that I did include all of Geoff's suggestions. The membership roll call is now called a survey ond the word open is included to explain how the survey will be done.
-------------- Original message from "Pat Thaler" <pthaler@BROADCOM.COM>: --------------
> The attachment doesn't appear to have the changes Geoff suggested. It
> addresses the question Geoff asked in his email but he had also attached
> a draft with mark-ups, mainly inserting "individual." His changes were
> editorial and improved clarity IMO.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List *****
> [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 12:50 PM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [802SEC] +++10 day Ballot+++opensMarc06Closes March16
> I have made the changes suggested by Geoff and it is shown in the
> I vote approve on the motion.
> -------------- Original message from "Geoff Thompson"
> > Arnie/Colleagues-
> > I have provided some minor editorial augmentation to the proposed
> > text to try to make sure that the text is as unambiguous as possible.
> > don't believe that anything that I did changed Arnie's intended
> > That certainly was not the intent.
> > Arnie, in addition to the provided text, you mentioned in our
> > calls that it was your intention to conduct the "Straw Poll" portion
> of the
> > procedure by secret ballot. In your procedure you say that:
> > "This vote (sic, it is not a vote) will be by roll call."
> > Which could easily be interpreted as being a fully open process.
> > Therefore, I strongly suggest that you make your procedure more
> > that is, you should add text that says one of the following things:
> > 1) The roll call "survey" (use your own favorite word here, but I
> > would discourage the use of the word "vote") will take place by
> > of secret paper ballots.
> > 2) The roll call survey will take place via an open roll call
> > voice survey by the chair
> > 3) The methodology and secrecy of the roll call process will be at
> > the discretion of the chair.
> > I hope that all of this, once Arnie makes the appropriate choice above
> > modifies the text accordingly can be done in the context of a friendly
> > amendment.
> > Best regards,
&g t; > Geoff Thompson
> > At 12:30 PM 3/6/2008 , greenspana@BELLSOUTH.NET wrote:
> > >Dear EC Members,
> > >
> > >The 802 Chair, Paul Nikolich, has delegated the conduct of the
> > >motion via 802 EC email ballot to me, Arnie Greenspan.
> > >
> > >Moved: The Unconflicted 802 EC members approve the attached voting
> > >procedure to be used for 802.20 WG officer selection during the March
> > >Plenary.
> > >Opens: 06 MAR 2008; Closes 16 MAR2008
> > >
> > >Mover: Arnie Greenspan
> > >Seconder: Buzz Rigsbee
> > >
> > >Unconflicted EC (UC EC) members regarding 802.20 WG matters are
> > >to cast a ballot on this issue.
> > >
> > >UC EC Voters:
> > >----------------
> > > CH Paul Nikolich
> > >ES Buzz Rigsbee
> > >RS Bob O'Hara
> > >TR John Hawkins
> > >01 Tony Jeffree
> > >15 Bob Heile
> > >17 John Lemon
> > >18 Mike Lynch
> > >20 Arnie Greenspan
> > >ME Geoff Thompson non-voting
> > >
> > >EC members not eligible to vote:
> > >--------------------------------
> > >V1 Mat Sherman
> > >V2 Pat Thaler
> > >03 Bob Grow
> > >11 Stuart Kerry
> > >16 Roger Marks
> > >19 Steve Shellhammer
> > >21 Vivek Gupta
> > >22 Carl Stevenson
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----------
> > >This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> > >list is maint ained by Listserv.
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
> This list is maintained by Listserv.
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list
> is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.