Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC telecon meetings



Paul-
In my view, this proposal helps substantially except that we need to be careful on the open meeting aspect.
That means that the conference calls would require:
    - sufficient advance notice of the conference call
    - sufficient distribution of the advance notice
    - sufficient conference ports available for observers
And, since this would be a significant change in process (even if not in rules) then I don't think we should do it until after the next Plenary so that we can adjust the expectations of our constituency at that time.

Geoff

On 4/26/10 11:10 AM, Paul Nikolich wrote:
Steve,

That is a very interesting suggestion--it gives us time to hash things out in real time and then make a quick decision in non-real, rule-compliant time...hmmm.

--Paul


----- Original Message ----- From: "Shellhammer, Steve" <sshellha@QUALCOMM.COM>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC telecon meetings


Paul,

One way to deal with this is to hold a non-voting meeting where we discuss motions and then to have a post-meeting electronic ballot, on each motion. So the discussion could take place during the call. We could even have a straw poll and it there is controversy discuss what the controversy is.

The main issue is the overhead of having the electronic ballot. Maybe a simple spreadsheet could be used to combine all the motions onto a single spreadsheet and people could just enter their votes. It is more overhead but it would be helpful to the WGs on motions to go to Sponsor ballot and RevCom. We might end up with less conditional motions to go to Sponsor ballot and RevCom since WGs would not have to wait 4 months.

I believe this works with the current rules.

Comments?

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:34 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC telecon meetings

Paul,

I don't think 2 quite covers the response I gave. My points were
-- we already have continuous processing available via email votes except for submittal of PARs to NesCom.
PARs to NesCom should continue to be an action taken only at plenaries
(except perhaps for corrigenda)
email is best for continuous processing of approval to go to sponsor ballot or RevCom -- therefore, I don't support having an interim EC meeting for these, but I could see one to deal with the topics and coordination that get short shrift during a busy plenary

Regards,
Pat

-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:04 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] straw poll summary of on the question of interim EC telecon meetings

All,

So far the responses generally fall into two categories:

1) good idea, need to work out details, go for it
(Apurva, Buzz, Steve,  Bruce, Jon, JohnH, Subir, Mike)

2) not a bad idea, have concerns, proceed with caution
(Pat, Mat, Tony, James, Geoff, JohnL, David)

Any further opinions? A few people (BobH, Roger, Mark) have yet to weigh
in.

Regards,

--Paul



----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:19 AM
Subject: [802SEC] straw poll on interim EC telecon meetings


Dear EC members,

I'd like to get your feedback on holding an EC meeting via teleconference between plenary sessions (for example in the 1st week of June, October and February). My though is we'd hold a 2 hour telecon to make decisions on
time-critical items such as PAR approvals, Sponsor Ballot initiation
approvals, RevCom submissions, etc.

I'd make sure we'd have an agenda posted 30 days in advance an all the
materials necessary to make such decisions available for review at least
one week before the telecon.

Thoughts?  Please provide your feedback by 23APR.  I'll summarize the
feedback and if the response is positive, I'd like us to consider holding
the first such meeting 1pm-3pm ET Friday 04JUN2010.

Regards,

--Paul




----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.


----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.