Re: [802SEC] +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot +++ IEEE 802 Inputs to ITU-R WP5A
James,
I can confirm that 0063 and 0064 are as approved in 802.18.
The versions embedded in 0067r1 are as furnished when 802.18 asked for a draft cover letter. Since the titles were the same it was presumed when I posted 0067 (originally) that these were the same as 0063 and 0064. I will remove the two embedded documents and replace them with 0063 and 0064.
Good catch.
Regards,
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: James Gilb [mailto:jpgilb@gmail.com] On Behalf Of James P. K. Gilb
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 14:23
To: MJLynch@mjlallc.com
Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Heile, Bob
Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot +++ IEEE 802 Inputs to ITU-R WP5A
Mike
Can you simply verify that 0063-00 and 0064-00 are what are actually
attached in the document? When I open the attachments, I get documents
different from them.
You pointed out in your original email that 0063-00 and 0064-00 we the
ones jointly generated by 802.11 and 802.15 and approved 5/0/1 in 801.18.
So, I agree that 0063-00 and 0064-00 should be attached, however, when I
open them, I get different documents.
Please verify that the correct documents are attached.
James Gilb
MJLynch@mjlallc.com wrote:
> James,
>
> May I defer to the 802.15 chair to repond? He was present when and voted when this was approved.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
> Sent from my Samsung Intrepid(tm) on the Now Network from Sprint(r).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James P. K. Gilb <gilb@ieee.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:04 PM
> To: MJLynch@mjlallc.com <MJLynch@mjlallc.com>
> Cc: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>; Bob Heile <bheile@ieee.org>
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++ 10-day EC Email Ballot +++ IEEE 802 Inputs to ITU-R WP5A
>
>
> Mike
>
> I vote disapprove
>
> The attachments in your document do not appear to be the latest
> documents. In particular, the information for 802.15.3c is missing from
> one of the documents.
>
> The approved documents approved by 802.15 were 18-10-0063-00 and
> 18-10-0064-00.
>
> I assume this is an oversight that you can correct quickly.
>
> James Gilb
>
> MJLynch@mjlallc.com wrote:
>> Dear EC,
>>
>> I'm sorry if things became confused with my earlier email.
>>
>> I have been authorized by the LMSC Chair to conduct an electronic
>> ballot on the following motion:
>>
>> Motion: "Per LMSC operations manual 9.2.1, to approve forwarding of
>> document 18-10-0067-01 to ITU-R WP5A as the position of IEEE 802
>> LMSC."
>>
>> Mover: Mike Lynch
>>
>> Second: Bruce Kraemer
>>
>> Due to the urgency of the decision, the early close provision of
>> 4.1.2.2 will apply. This material needs to be received by the ITU-R
>> by 16:00 Geneva time on 1st November. I propose that the ballot start
>> date is 26th October. It is hoped that sufficient positive ballots
>> will be received to allow for the early termination and submission to
>> ITU-R.
>>
>> There was some discussion on the earlier thread about using terms
>> such as "IEEE looks forward...". IEEE is the ITU-R Sector Member and
>> is who the ITU-R corresponds with rather than IEEE 802.. The use of
>> the Sector Member's name is appropriate.
>>
>> Doc. 18-10-0067-01 is available on the 802.18 Mentor web site.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> +1.972.814.4901 mike.lynchieee (Skype)
>>
>> ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email
>> reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>>
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.