Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] 802.1Qbh PAR comments

Tony
Same answer from me. If the group does not intend to include the scope, then there is no need to fix it in the PAR.
Unfortunately, there is no way to indicate this in the PAR form. It would be nice if you could mark them as not to be included in the draft. 

It wouldn't hurt to make the suggested changes either.

James Gilb

On 03/14/2011 11:52 PM, Tony Jeffree wrote:

James -

And again, this is an amendment; these words are not intented (or required)
to go in the standard.

Regards,
Tony


On 15 March 2011 06:02, James P. K. Gilb<gilb@ieee.org>  wrote:


All

Section 5.2 Scope

The scope uses text that speaks of the future, yet the scope will go into
the finished standard and so should be written as past tense. Accordingly, I
suggest the following changes:

Change "is envisioned to support" to be "has been added to support"

Change "It is expected that this amendment will result in the definition of
a new device (a Port Extender) and optional augmentation ..." to be "This
amendment has defined a new device, a Port Extender, and optional
augmentation ..."

Thanks

James Gilb
IEEE 802 LMSC Recording Secretary





----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.