Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Ballot Closed - RE: +++urgent+++10 day ECM+++ Approval of OfCom Improving access to 5GHz band Consultation responses, filing due 22 July, 2016



Jay

I agree with Roger's concern and strongly support the addition of the text that Geoff and Roger worked out.

As Roger mentioned, there are editorial issues that should be corrected prior to submission (we have plenty of time).

Slide 6: "It should be noted, that this band is already open for RLAN use, many regions of the world and large markets." should probably be "It should be noted, that this band is already open for RLAN use in many regions of the world."

Slide 6: "The entry into the spectrum dominated by Wi-Fi for 20 years, of other technologies, even if they share fairly, reduces the already congested space by at least 50%, making the need for additional spectrum real and urgent." is poorly written. It would be better as: "The entry of other technologies into the spectrum dominated by Wi-Fi for 20 years, even if they share fairly, reduces the already congested space by at least 50%. This makes the need for additional spectrum real and urgent."

Slide 8: "Our answer to question 1. makes our opinion clear on the need for additional spectrum." Doesn't come across well. I would suggest "IEEE 802, as stated in the answer to question 1, agrees with the need for additional spectrum."

Slide 9: "The trend in new Internet connected devices is only wireless connectivity." as pointed out in the email trail, this is not the only trend for these devices. The correct way to state this is "One trend in new Internet connected devices is the increasing use of wireless connectivity."

Slide 10: Too late to fix this now, but the slide does not answer the second questions request for evidence.

Slide 11: The last question "What difference in speeds and quality of experience would additional spectrum make?" was not answered. It would have been good to add a comment regarding how much additional capacity would be opened up by adding the new bands.

Slide 12: "BW" is informal and not introduced as an acronym. Change "BW" to be "bandwidth" in two locations. Put a space in "5GHz" and "160MHz" (numbers are separated from a unit with a space).

James Gilb

On 07/15/2016 07:37 AM, Holcomb, Jay wrote:
Dear EC,
On behave of Rich and myself, I would like to thank everyone for voting so quickly.



In accordance with 4.1.2 'Electronic Balloting' of the IEEE project 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual there is sufficient response to decide this ballot and early termination as pre-announced.  Therefore the ballot is closed.



Please see below for results of the ballot, and per the results “Motion passes”.

We do appreciate the inputs Roger, Geoff, Bob and others provided, and I have heard from Rich and we should be able to get them in as editorial changes.  After that we will work with Paul with the upload to Ofcom.

I also want to thank Adrian and JohnN for all the background help they provided me, being my first EC ballot.

Best Regards,
Jay Holcomb
IEEE 802.18 Vice-Chair

Voter Role

Name

NV

APP

DIS

ABS

DNV

CH

Paul Nikolich









DNV

VC

Pat Thaler









DNV

VC

James PK Gilb









DNV

TR

Clint Chaplin



APP







RS

John D'Ambrosia



APP







ES

Jon W Rosdahl



APP







01

Glenn Parsons









DNV

03

David Law



APP







11

Adrian P Stephens



APP







15

Bob Heile



APP







16

Roger Marks





DIS





17

John Lemon

NV









18

Rich Kennedy



APP







19

Steve Shellhammer









DNV

20

Radhakrishna Canchi

NV









21

Subir Das



APP







22

Apurva Mody



APP







24

Tim Godfrey



APP







ME

Geoffrey Thompson

NV









Totals

19

3

10

1

0

5


Role

Meaning











CH

Chair











VC

Vice Chair











TR

Treasurer











RS

Recording Secretary











ES

Executive Secretary











<n>

WG <n> Chair











ME

Member Emeritus














Results analysis













Return %:

68.75











Approve %:

90.91











Early Close Approve %:

62.50











Required return > %:

50











Required approval > %:

50











From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@att.net]
Sent: Thursday, 14 July, 2016 10:38
To: Holcomb, Jay <Jay.Holcomb@itron.com>; STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: +++urgent+++10 day ECM+++ Approval of OfCom Improving access to 5GHz band Consultation responses, filing due 22 July, 2016

All, this is a resend with the agreed upon 802 EC motion subject line text.  The full title of the Ofcom 13/05/2016 Consultation is "Improving spectrum access for consumers in the 5GHz band.  Regards,  --Paul05/2016

------ Original Message ------
From: "Holcomb, Jay" <Jay.Holcomb@itron.com<mailto:Jay.Holcomb@itron.com>>
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org<mailto:STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: 7/14/2016 9:56:43 AM
Subject: [802SEC] Motion on OfCom Consultation, filing due 22 July, 2016
Dear EC Members,

Paul has delegated to Rich Kennedy to conduct an EC electronic ballot on the following motion. To ensure this motion is decided well before the 22 July 2016 Ofcom filing deadline I'm announcing an 'early close' to this ballot (see below).

802 EC motion per 802 OM 8.2 Procedure for communication with government bodies:

Move to approve the responses to the 13/05/2016 Ofcom  consultation (see http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/5-GHz-Wi-Fi/?a=0) as defined in document https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/16/18-16-0036-06-0000-ofcom-5-gfhz-consultation-questions.ppt which contain the 802.18 approved (5/0/0) responses, instructions for uploading to Ofcom webpage and granting the 802.18 chair editorial license.

Mover: Rich Kennedy, Seconder: Adrian Stephens

Start of ballot:  July 14, 2016
End of ballot: July 14 + 10 days or sooner per Early Close provisions

Early close: As required in subclause 4.1.2 'Voting rules' of the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Operations Manual, this is notice that, to ensure the release is provided in a timely manner, this ballot may close early once sufficient responses are received to clearly decide a matter. Sufficient responses to clearly decide this matter will be based on the required majority for a motion under subclause 7.1.1 'Actions requiring approval by a majority vote' item (h), 'Other motions brought to the floor by members (when deemed in order by the Sponsor Chair)' of the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC) Policies and Procedures.

On behave of Rich Kennedy, Chair of IEEE 802.18
Regards,
Jay R. Holcomb
IEEE 802.18 Vice Chair
R&D Spectrum Regulatory
2111 N Molter Road
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
509/891-3281, -3896 fax
509/979-3625 cell
jay.holcomb@itron.com<mailto:jay.holcomb@itron.com>
Itron
Knowledge to Shape Your Future



---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.


----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.