Re: ATML Test Results Finalization

["David Barton" <d.barton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: RE: ATML Test Results Finalization

Bill Birurakis writes:

If it is premature to introduce ATML to IEEE maybe we should withdrawl it until we complete it.  Comments.  Does 1232 need to be incorperated into the ATML?  Is anyone using 1232?

 

Just plain me.

 

Bill

Working within a standards group such as SCC20 is *not* the only option of IEEE sponsorship.  If more work needs to be done, but we wish to keep an IEEE tie, then that work can be done under the DATC auspices, and regular reports can be made to the SCC20 (or DASC, for that matter) Steering Commitee, and lay the groundwork for the creation of a PAR and a study group at the appropriate time.  The IEEE has many ways to work; the goal is to create the appropriate structure, not fight the rules by moving into the standardization mechanism prematurely.

 

Of course, if ATML is ready, then we go to SCC20 whenever it is ready.  No need to farble around.

 

It's all a question of what is needed.

 

Dave Barton

Chair-Elect, DATC

EDAptive Computing