Re: [ieee] RE: Hand Recounts of votes recorded on DREs
- To: Brit Williams <britw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <williamsv@xxxxxxxx>, Arthur Keller <ark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ieee] RE: Hand Recounts of votes recorded on DREs
- From: Barbara Simons <simons@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:46:47 -0800
- CC: "Stanley A. Klein" <sklein@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Berg <andrewb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Hogzett, Robert" <rghogzett@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <pklammer@xxxxxxx>, <stds-1583-stg3@xxxxxxxx>, <stds-1583-disc@xxxxxxxx>, <stds-1583-tg1@xxxxxxxx>, <stds-1583-tg2@xxxxxxxx>
- In-Reply-To: <001901c4e097$abcc1a20$6502a8c0@bwilliams>
- Sender: owner-stds-1583-disc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.6.040913.0
If thermal printers cannot satisfy strong reliability standards, they should
not be allowed on voting machines. If DREs in use in California cannot be
retrofitted with reliable printers, then they should be returned to the
manufacturers, and the manufacturers should refund their cost, perhaps
prorated.
Regards,
Barbara
On 12/12/04 14:12, "Brit Williams" <britw@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Most of these machines do not use ink cartridges. The use thermal printers.
>
> Brit