Re: [ieee] RE: Hand Recounts of votes recorded on DREs
- To: <williamsv@xxxxxxxx>, "Arthur Keller" <ark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ieee] RE: Hand Recounts of votes recorded on DREs
- From: "Brit Williams" <britw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:14:01 -0500
- Cc: <williamsv@xxxxxxxx>, "Stanley A. Klein" <sklein@xxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Berg" <andrewb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Hogzett, Robert" <rghogzett@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Barbara Simons'" <simons@xxxxxxx>, <pklammer@xxxxxxx>, <stds-1583-stg3@xxxxxxxx>, <stds-1583-disc@xxxxxxxx>, <stds-1583-tg1@xxxxxxxx>, <stds-1583-tg2@xxxxxxxx>
- References: <820212CF2FD63647B52A8F64B35352B204B50607@essomaexc1.essvote.com> <1102637113.1276.39.camel@p500> <opsistdbgqqh31du@congress> <1102696518.1281.23.camel@p500> <41B9D9D8.4000908@earthlink.net> <p06200774bddf928c4100@[10.0.0.4]> <41B9E8BC.4010204@earthlink.net>
- Sender: owner-stds-1583-tg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Not to mention that if the paper receipt from an ATM disagrees with the
bank's electronic record the electronic record is, by law, considered
correct.
Brit
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vern Williams" <vernonw74@EARTHLINK.NET>
To: "Arthur Keller" <ark@SOE.UCSC.EDU>
Cc: <williamsv@saic.com>; "Stanley A. Klein" <sklein@CPCUG.ORG>; "Andrew
Berg" <andrewb@votehere.com>; "Hogzett, Robert" <rghogzett@ESSVOTE.COM>;
"'Barbara Simons'" <simons@ACM.ORG>; <pklammer@ACM.ORG>;
<stds-1583-stg3@IEEE.ORG>; <stds-1583-disc@IEEE.ORG>;
<stds-1583-tg1@IEEE.ORG>; <stds-1583-tg2@IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ieee] RE: Hand Recounts of votes recorded on DREs
> One of the differences that you did not address is the 22 month
> retention requirement and the handling required to look at the paper
> record and then cancel it and vote again if you did not select the
> correct candidate the first time. Additionally, ATMs are in constant
> use, not put away for 2 years between uses. I have had to go to a
> different ATM several (~5 times that I can specifically remember) times
> due to one not working. I do not know if it was out of ink, paper or
> money, but it was not available to use. Additionally, the receipt
> printer at Gas stations have reliability problems as well and I have had
> to go inside many times to get a receipt.
> R/ Vern
>
>
> Arthur Keller wrote:
>
>> Does someone know how often ATMs go down because their printers don't
>> work. Putting a new ink cartridge at the start of an election should
>> solve most of those problems.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Arthur
>>
>> At 11:16 AM -0600 12/10/04, Vern Williams wrote:
>>
>>> Stan,
>>> I think you need a reality check. The most failure prone component of
>>> the "paper trail" system you seem so obsessed with is the printer with
>>> it's mechanical parts and ink delivery system. You state many of your
>>> pet opinions as fact which is far from true.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>
> --
> Quote of the week...
>
> "Posterity -- you will never know how much it has cost my generation to
> preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it."
>
> --John Quincy Adams
>
>
> Vern Williams, CISSP ISSEP CBCP CHSP IAM
> Senior Security Engineer / Analyst, SAIC
> Senior Member, IEEE
> Vernon.C.Williams@SAIC.com
> Cell: 512-635-5315
>
> Any comments are my opinion and not the official position of SAIC.
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private,
> confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any
> attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and
> permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any
> attachments thereto.
>