Re: SUO: IFF Updates 2002-Jan-02, Comments Requested
Jim,
Since you've asked for comments I feel I need to reiterate
1. My respect for the fact that the IFF team has made a substantial,
specific proposal in "standards words".
2. My concern that no one has answered how this addresses the PAR and
provides anything beyond what the KIF language already provides for
representing and reasoning about real world
examples. <http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg06027.html>
Adam
At 09:54 AM 1/7/2002 -0500, Jim Farrugia wrote:
>All,
>
>We again solicit your comments on the IFF Foundation Ontology.
>
>Revised versions of four of the five documents of the IFF Foundation
>Ontology have been posted at a link from the main page
>
>http://suo.ieee.org/IFF/
>
>The most recent version is that of 2001-01-02.
>
>A description of the changes is available from the main page,
>as well as from
>
>http://suo.ieee.org/IFF/changes/20011205_to_20020102/
>
>Please use this email's Subject line in your responses to the list.
>
>(As usual, please notify me offline of any link problems or
>site irregularities).
>
>Thank you.
>
>On behalf of the IFF Editing Team,
>
>Jim
Adam Pease
Teknowledge
(650) 424-0500 x571