Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

SUO: Appeal #2:




ATTN: Lowell Johnson, Chair, CS SAB:

 	I appeal this directive because the process used to arrive at it
violated the requirements of Openness and Due Process.  IEEE and the
Computer Society have an appeals process, but it was not followed for this
matter.  Bob Spillers raised the issue of how to computer a majority (with
respect to a vote on commencing work on the SUMO starter document), and
IEEE-SA BoG directed the specific vote be retaken.  Bob did not put in an
appeal, but his request was taken up and acted upon as if it were an appeal.
This agenda item at this meeting of the IEEE-SA BOG was not announced and
the meeting was not open.  Stakeholders, including myself, were not given
the opportunity to present their views. This directive should not stand
because of this gross violation of Openness and Due Process.

Resolution:  I will withdraw this appeal if the IEEE-SA BoG withdraws this
directive.

Jim Schoening
Chair, P1600.1 SUO WG


-----Original Message-----
From: r.gertz@ieee.org [mailto:r.gertz@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Schoening, James R CECOM DCSC4I
Cc: Judy Gorman (E-mail); 'l.gargiulo@ieee.org'
Subject: Re: Need response TODAY



Hi Jim:

Following is the IEEE-SA Board of Governor's action taken regarding P1600.1

The IEEE-SA BOG concluded at their November meeting that the recent ruling
by Dorsey and Whitney, IEEE legal counsel, should be upheld.  At the
IEEE-SA BOG meeting, the group unanimously approved the following motion
regarding P1600.1:

There was a motion and second by Dennis Bodson and Don Loughry as follows:

The IEEE-SA BOG considered the inquiries of the IEEE 1600.1 working group
and the opinion of 7 November 2001 offered by Dorsey and Whitney and
concurs with and reaffirms the opinion stated.  Therefore, the IEEE-SA BOG
directs the IEEE-SA Standards Board to inform the P1600.1 working group
that it is required to re-ballot its initial deliberation, based on the
requirements outlined in the aforementioned letter.

Further, the IEEE-SA BOG encourages the IEEE-SA Standards Board to instruct
the IEEE P1600.1 working group on the principles of consensus in the
working group processes.

Upon vote the motion was unanimously approved.

This action will be carried out before the end of 2001 and is offered as an
information item to the IEEE SASB.  The IEEE SASB is encouraging the
IEEE-SA BOG to take action to clarify this issue of all working groups.
Language will be developed for approval at the February BOG meeting.


_______________________________
Rona I. Gertz
Manager, IEEE-SA Governance
IEEE Standards Activities
r.gertz@ieee.org
+1 732 562 3808 (phone); +1 732 562 1571 (fax)
IEEE Standards web site:http://standards.ieee.org/


 

                    "Schoening, James R CECOM

                    DCSC4I"                               To:
"'l.gargiulo@ieee.org'" <l.gargiulo@ieee.org>,    
                    <James.Schoening@mail1.monmouth        "Judy Gorman
(E-mail)" <j.gorman@ieee.org>, "Rona Gertz  
                    .army.mil>                             (E-mail)"
<r.gertz@ieee.org>                             
                                                          cc:

                    12/07/2001 09:34 AM                   Subject:     Need
response TODAY                          
 

 





Linda, Judy, and Rona,

           As this has dragged on since Aug, please clue me in TODAY on
what's
going on.

Jim Schoening



-----Original Message-----
From: l.gargiulo@ieee.org [mailto:l.gargiulo@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:45 AM
To: james.schoening@mail1.monmouth.army.mil
Subject: Forwarded message form Judy Gorman


Jim, Judy Gorman at the IEEE asked me to forward this to you.

Linda A. Gargiulo
Senior Administrator
IEEE Standards
445 Hoes Lane, PO Box 1331
Piscataway, NJ  08855-1331 USA
+1 732 562 3801 phone
+1 732 562 1571 fax
http://standards.ieee.org/
----- Forwarded by Linda Gargiulo/STDS/STAFF/US/IEEE on 12/03/01 11:03 AM
-----


                    Judith Gorman

                                         To:     Linda
Gargiulo/STDS/STAFF/US/IEEE@IEEE
                    12/03/01 09:06       cc:

                    AM                   Subject:








Please get this to Jim Schoening. Thanks.
Judy
----- Forwarded by Judith Gorman/STDS/STAFF/US/IEEE on 12/03/01 09:06 AM
-----

Delivery Failure Report

 Your
 document:

 was not     James.Schoening@mail1.monmouth
 delivered
 to:

 because:    550 Host unknown






What should you do?

   You can resend the undeliverable document to the recipients listed above
   by choosing the Resend button or the Resend command on the Actions menu.

   Once you have resent the document you may delete this Delivery Failure
   Report.

   If resending the document is not successful you will receive a new
   failure report.

   Unless you receive other Delivery Failure Reports, the document was
   successfully delivered to all other recipients.





   Buzz/US/IEEE




  |     To:  James.Schoening@mail1.monmouth



  |     cc:



      Date:  08:48:06 AM Today




   Subject:





Dear Jim:
On Thursday of last week, the IEEE-SA Board of Governors took action on
matters involving the IEEE P1600.1 standards activity. Rona Gertz, in
cooperation with me, will send out all the actions later this week, and we
will ensure that you receive a copy of the communcation.
Best regards,
Judy