Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

SUO: RE: Gathering questions and issues with IEEE motion



Title: RE: Gathering questions and issues with IEEE motion

The support below is gratifying.  I accept the points about "majority" and 50%.  I deliberately made the formula more general but used "majority" instead of a more suitable expression such as "motion carried";  I had in mind to also cover higher barriers such as occurs in the later stages of ISO standards development.

Cheers,
Tim.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John F. Sowa [mailto:sowa@bestweb.net]
> Sent: 22 January 2002 16:42
> To: Tim King
> Cc: Standard-Upper-Ontology (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Gathering questions and issues with IEEE motion
>
>
> I like what seems to be to be a sound basis for an emering consensus:
> the suggestions by Matthew West, as extended by Tim King and further
> supported and clarified by Jon Awbrey.
>
> Following is Tim's extension to Matthew's suggestion:
>
>    Voting options = Yes, No, Abstain (no opinion), Abstain (not  
> participating)
>
>    Active members (registered to continue membership) = Yes + No +
>    Abstain (no opinion) + Abstain (not participating)
>
>    Voters = Yes + No + Abstain (no opinion)
>
>    Quorum:  Voters / Active members > x%
>
>    Majority:  Yes / Voters > y%
>
> Following is Jon's clarification (with my amendment of ">"
> rather than ">=" in the last line):
>
>    To avoid confusion, any suitable response, for
>    example "yes", "no", "abstain", or "present"
>    counts as a record of presence, while the
>    absence of such counts as a record of
>    absence.  By definition, y > 50.
>
> I hereby move that Tim King's extension with this clarification
> be adopted for all future votes to be taken by the SUO group.
>
> John Sowa
>



*************************************************
COMPANY NOTICE
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you
are not the intended recipient (or authorised to receive information for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies
of this message. If this e-mail contains attachments, you should ensure they are checked for viruses before opening them.
*************************************************
This e-mail originates from LSC GROUP LIMITED. Registered in
England & Wales No 2275471
Registered Office: Devonport Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG
*************************************************