Re: SUO: More empty argument from Bob Spillers
On 1/22/02 16:49, "Schoening, James R CECOM DCSC4I"
<James.Schoening@mail1.monmouth.army.mil> wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Your arguments are so empty.
Jim,
This isn't directed at you, but the snippet of text above serves as an
example of how far afield this has thread gone from the intended subject
matter of this group.
This sort of discussion belongs offline or in a separate subgroup (how about
SUO-CSPAN or SUO-Court-TV or SUO-Jerry-Springer). Just as with the
situation with JA, the issues may be important, but the bandwidth and tone
of these discussions is definitely distracting to those of us who are
interested in building an ontology standard. I suspect I speak for many on
this list when I say that my spirits have been dampened and my desire to
participate weakened.
So, please everybody, for the health of the group, take this conversation
somewhere else. Thanks.
.bill