Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

SUO: Re: W3C ontology requirements


From: "murray j bent" <murrayb@imailbox.com>

> about web ontology requirements is at
> http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/owl/

I think there is another lesson that SUO could learn from OWL.

Quoting from the above document:

   "Clean interface to other standards including (but not only)
     XML-standards. This is a standards-based industry, and
     the clear relationship of OWL to RDF/RDFS/DAML etc.
     is important. "

I mean SUMO is making absolutely no effort to Webize the ontology constants.
And, NO, a URL like
http://ontology.teknowledge.com:8080/rsigma/SKB.jsp?req=SC&name=Entity&caseS
ensitive=on
is NOT  good URI for "Entity" ... and I'm not even talking about the fact
that the ontology browser doent' seem to be working at the moment.

For some suggestions about how to give our constants better URI please see:
http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sw/draft-pstickler-uri-taxonomy-00.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jan/0127.html

Seth Russell