Re: SUO: Re: W3C ontology requirements
Seth,
At 11:00 AM 2/5/2002 -0800, Seth Russell wrote:
>From: "murray j bent" <murrayb@imailbox.com>
>
> > about web ontology requirements is at
> > http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/owl/
>
>I think there is another lesson that SUO could learn from OWL.
>
>Quoting from the above document:
>
> "Clean interface to other standards including (but not only)
> XML-standards. This is a standards-based industry, and
> the clear relationship of OWL to RDF/RDFS/DAML etc.
> is important. "
>
>I mean SUMO is making absolutely no effort to Webize the ontology constants.
Please take a look at <http://reliant.teknowledge.com/DAML/SUO.daml> which
is a version of SUMO in DAML, which is a web ontology standard the W3C is
involved in.
>And, NO, a URL like
>http://ontology.teknowledge.com:8080/rsigma/SKB.jsp?req=SC&name=Entity&caseS
>ensitive=on
>is NOT good URI for "Entity" ... and I'm not even talking about the fact
>that the ontology browser doent' seem to be working at the moment.
>
>For some suggestions about how to give our constants better URI please see:
>http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sw/draft-pstickler-uri-taxonomy-00.html
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jan/0127.html
>
>Seth Russell
Adam Pease
Teknowledge
(650) 424-0500 x571