Re: SUO: *Date 16 Feb 2002
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
To: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>; "Jon Awbrey" <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
Cc: "Stand Up Ontology" <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>
Sent: 17.febbraio.2002 0.50
Subject: RE: SUO: *Date 16 Feb 2002
> However, I am sure if a SUO were carved in stone today (e.g. by ISO), it
> would be redundant in a few weeks time - surely it is possible to agree on
a
> standard v0.1, that once people had chance to play with it would return as
> v0.1.1 and so on.
>This would strike me as far more productive than non-starters & political
gaming.
I agree (once again). And as a matter of fact I think that Sumo (and Cyc)
appear particularly promising (at least to me) precisely because these
ontologies are supposed to be based on some kind of practice too.
All the best. Roberto Bordogna.