Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: SUO: Request that KER article be amended

Matthew,
I was responding to Frank Farance's claim that the SUMO is a starter document.  It's not.  

Bob


West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE wrote:
DE057CA9F46ED2118C4900805F85E4270859B58D@LONSC0S0038">
Dear Bob,
 
To be fair to the Tecknowledge crowd, they made no claim that their
work had passed any vote (or had failed any vote) or that it had
any special status.
 

Matthew West
Principal Consultant
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7934 4490Other Tel: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.r.west@is.shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Grayson Spillers [mailto:skydog@pacbell.net]
Sent: 20 February 2002 21:21
To: Frank Farance
Cc: standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
Subject: Re: SUO: Request that KER article be amended

Frank,
In your response to Matthew (and to Murray) you state

The paper makes it clear that the both documents are "starter documents"...
The SUMO is not a starter document for the SUO WG.  The IEEE Board of Governors has unanimously ruled that the SUMO vote failed.  The SUMO enjoys no special status within the SUO WG.

Bob