Re: SUO: Re: IFF Model Theory Ontology 1.0, Request For Comment
Bill Andersen wrote:
> [Robert Kent wrote:]
> > Yes, that is a nice syntax. But you still need a good semantics. I
> > presume the CL doc
> > <http://cl.tamu.edu/discuss/cl-syntax-semantics.pdf> provides a
> > set-theoretic semantics (I have not been able to read it as of yet,
> > since I get a corrupted file when I try.)
>
> Yes, It does. Funny that you can't read it. Send mail to Menzel (I
> will cc him on this note) and see if you can't get a version you can
> read.
Robert has informed me that there is some sort of configuration problem
between Internet Explorer and the Acrobat Reader plug-in. The file
will display just fine if you download it to disk and open it in the
Acrobat reader directly.
-chris