| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
My thought below ...
-----Original Message-----
From: John F. Sowa [mailto:sowa@bestweb.net]
Sent: 03 June 2003 16:32
To: Mike Pool
Cc: Eric Peterson; standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org;
jawbrey@oakland.edu; jim.s3@juno.com
Subject: Re: SUO: Re: SUO Ballot with 2 Questions
<snip>
As we agree, a registry, by itself, does not give us a standard
ontology. But it is a step toward a standard. Without it,
a standard ontology is impossible.
John Sowa
<ed>
I am not sure that I understand this to be technically impossible ... but I can imagine that a "all-or-nothing" proposal gives us no easy basis on which to sort out the acceptable content from the troublesome. Otherwise, I am with you all the way John ...
FWIW
Cheers,
Tim.
*************************************************
COMPANY NOTICE
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you
are not the intended recipient (or authorised to receive information for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies
of this message. If this e-mail contains attachments, you should ensure they are checked for viruses before opening them.
*************************************************
This e-mail originates from LSC GROUP LIMITED. Registered in
England & Wales No 2275471
Registered Office: Devonport Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG
*************************************************