Re: SUO: Registry etc.
TWIMC,
At 13:18 2003-06-06, Frank Farance wrote:
>...
>
>Like most things, you can optimize them for whatever purpose you
>want. If the primary goal is merely version control, then Adam's
>solution (CVS) is probably your best choice. However, CVS doesn't
>give you an inherent relationship capability. Sure, one can use URIs
>(via embedding or markup), but that isn't an inherent part of CVS --
>that might be a good quality or a bad quality, depending on your design goals.
This is a bit of a tangent, but anybody building a collaborative system
that, among other things, requires version control and management would
be well advised to consider Subversion:
<http://subversion.tigris.org/>. This open source software has yet to
release version 1.0 status, but it is being used as the sole
source-code and version management tool in its own development, so it
should be considered a viable candidate for any new development
requiring a version management component.
>....
>
>-FF
Randall Schulz