Re: SUO: Re: Registry etc.
Juan Elevancini a écrit :
(in http://groups.yahoo.com/group/semanticweb/message/997)
>
> No need for patronizing.
> ------------------------------\
>
> This is a preprint of a paper which has now appeared in the IEEE Intelligent Systems Journal (march/April 2001)
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler/AgentWeb.html
I just had a look, this is only a "sales pitch".
To keep with my usual bad taste,
I would say that I don't like the sound of the pitch (but... I didn't say that!)
>The research issues inherent in such ontology mappings are quite interesting and challenging.
>For example, two agents that communicate often might want to have maximal mappings or even a merged ontology.
>Two agents that are simply sending a single message may simply want some sort of quick,
>"on the fly" translation limited just to the terms in a particular message.
True, any idea how?
No trace of how in the mentionned paper, just "it could be"...
>Another approach may be to use very large ontologies, such as CYC (Lenat and Guha, 1990) to actually infer mapping terms between agents in other ontologies.
This "very large" ontology would then be the true one and only SUO?
Cannot be done!
Could you please consider reading the *content* of my posting:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/semanticweb/message/983
Possibly arguing against if you like to,
but not just relying on "authority" arguments.
(No need for patronizing, Hendler solved the question in 2001)
>The possibilities are endless, and are another exciting challenge for researchers interested in bringing agents to the semantic web.
HYPE!
Some more patience needed.
Cheers.
-- Jean-Luc Delatre
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes.
I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal."
-- Zaphod Beeblebrox (The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://perso.club-internet.fr/jld/ -- GSM: +33 6 11 24 06 29