SUO: Re: Registry, Etc.
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| Jean-Luc's Agenda:
|
| 1. Discover sex.
| 2. Inform parents.
| 3. Alert the media.
Cher Jean-Luc,
Consider the media alerted.
Chaleureusement,
Jon
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
Jean-Luc Delatre wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Good, gentlemen (and ladies), very good.
> You are slowly coming to realise that:
>
> 1) No UNIQUE ontology will do, even when looking for an "upper" one.
>
> 2) No finite PRESET number of ontologies will do either.
> (see also: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/semanticweb/message/992)
>
> 3) Ontologies must be "related", "cross-mapped", "interoperable", whatever.
>
> 4) There is a need to track versions, authorship and any number
> of "meta" informations about a whole LOT of ontologies.
>
> Then, only a few more months (I hope it's not years...) and you will
> start asking the next set of meaningful and relevant QUESTIONS.
> (Yeah, well, questions must stated and understood before
> looking for answers...)
>
> Best.
>
> -- Jean-Luc Delatre
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Far better an approximate answer to the right question,
> which is often vague, than an exact answer to the wrong
> question, which can always be made precise."
> -- John W. Tukey
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o