RE: A NEW FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FORMAL MOTION: was RE: SUO: Re: SUO Ballot with 2 Questions
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John F. Sowa [mailto:sowa@bestweb.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 12:07 PM
> To: West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE
> Cc: Eric Peterson; Mike Pool; apease@ks.teknowledge.com;
clegg@cyc.com;
> John DeOliveira; Patrick Cassidy; standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: A NEW FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FORMAL MOTION: was RE: SUO:
Re:
> SUO Ballot with 2 Questions
>
> Eric,
>
> I completely agree with Matthew.
>
> When I said that I would second your motion
> to reaffirm the goals stated in the SUO charter,
> that is what I meant. This motion goes so far
> beyond those goals that I cannot accept it.
[ELP] John, to keep my word, I will change my vote in favor motion #2
with the addition of the changes I proposed earlier.
But the "NEW FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FORMAL MOTION" which I will call
the "de facto standard" motion, was intended to focus this group in a
very different direction.
And while I would certainly value your backing on this new proposal, I
didn't expect it.
-Eric