Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: SUO: Vote on SUO ballot




Nicola,
   I'm disappointed in your vote and rationale.  One should not conclude 
that having a different methodology implies a lack of methodology, or that 
not having been involved in an analysis of alternatives, that one was not 
performed.  I'm also very puzzled about your assertion that SUMO would have 
a high risk of inconsistency since we've done extensive formal theorem 
proving to try to catch such inconsistencies.

Adam

At 05:00 PM 6/13/2003 +0200, Nicola Guarino wrote:

>Dear Jim,
>
>         I vote NO on question #1,
>
>         and YES on question #2.
>
>I vote NO on SUMO since I believe that the main reservations I expressed 
>in the past (lack of methodology, combination of different sources without 
>adequate analysis of the underlying ontological choices, high risk of 
>inconsistencies, etc.) are still valid.
>
>I vote YES  on John Sowa's proposal because I believe it can be a 
>reasonable starting point for seriously comparing different ontological 
>proposals. I noticed however that the latest formulation does not foresee 
>considering other proposals besides IFF, OpenCYC and SUMO, despite the 
>discussion on this point (well, I followed it only very cursory). I hope 
>there will be space in the future to consider other proposals, and in 
>particular the DOLCE ontology 
>http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org/deliverables/D17.shtml
>that various people have mentioned already.
>
>Moreover, I hope it will be possible to be possible to compare the various 
>theories John mentions in his proposal in terms of their different 
>ontological choices, not just in terms of simple 
>generalization/specialization hierarchies. The interesting thing is to 
>understand why and where two theories are different, and what are the 
>consequences of the different positions. This is the approach we are 
>pursuing with the WonderWeb foundational ontology library.
>
>More comments on DOLCE and the WonderWeb project in the next message.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Nicola
>
>P.S.: Keep in mind that my reaction time to SUO messages is LONG. Sorry 
>for that.
>--
>
>Nicola Guarino
>
>Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA), ISTC-CNR
>Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technologies
>National Research Council
>Via Solteri, 38
>I-38100 Trento
>
>phone:  +39 0461 402088
>fax:    +39 0461/435344
>email: Nicola.Guarino@ladseb.pd.cnr.it
>http://ontology.ip.rm.cnr.it
>Provisional mirror site: http://www.isib.cnr.it/infor/ontology/ontology.html