Re: SUO: Re: SUO -- Technical Methodology
Pat,
Yes you are absolutely right. The W3C WebOnt group does this or, as one member recently confided to me, "discussion could continue endlessly."
The suggestion that the group not be bothered with this kind of machinery is akin to everyone just doing what they will and posting various comments to the list as their fancy moves them.
The fact that there is resistant to this kind of thing is baffling, particulary with the case of John Sowa, who has been such a stalwart contributor for so long it hardly seems plausible that he isn't serious about progress. What's the problem?
Again: the issue isn't a technical one about indexing everything, it's a methodological one about how to proceed. It's hard enough get one's fee with this effort when its all anonymous with no culpability, no membership fees, no nothing. If everyone really wanted to show some verve and make progress, the first thing to address would be these methodological points that provide a framework for success.
Erik
Patrick Cassidy <pcassidy@bellatlantic.net> wrote:
Don't most (all?) standards bodies take votes at
intermediate stages to finalize some decisions and get on
with other issues?
Pat
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!